From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753541AbZITBFA (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:05:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753428AbZITBFA (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:05:00 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:45903 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753417AbZITBE7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:04:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4AB57FB9.2020705@goop.org> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:04:57 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Alok Kataria , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Chris Wright , Rusty Russell , virtualization@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI]. References: <1253233028.19731.63.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090919224430.GB9567@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20090919224430.GB9567@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.97a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/19/09 15:44, Greg KH wrote: > That sounds good to me, how intrusive are the patches to do this? Is it > going to be tricky to get everything merged properly in -tip for it? They should be very local - just a matter of removing a couple of files and dropping some config options. J