Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial

[Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>]

Anteru schrieb:

> First of all, what's the matter with git and Windows, is there some
> long-term commitment to make git work on Windows as well as on Linux?
> I'm using msysgit on Windows, and personally I'm happy with it, but my
> co-workers constantly nag that Mercurial has superior portability ...

That tale is told all over, but that doesn't make it truer. I've never had
issues getting a Cygwin version of git to work properly (haven't tried the
msysgit or jgit variants, never felt the need), and integration went smooth.

With Mercurial, getting it integrated with a Windows-native Emacs (Cygwin emacs
doesn't work for me but hangs on startup) was somewhat of an undertaking even
with Cygwin's bash (rather than cmdproxy) underneath Emacs. It boiled down to
building Mercurial with py2exe and create an installer and use the compiled
hg.exe which I find starts rather slowly.

> So far, my key arguments are that git is more robust (more projects
> using it, larger developer base), of course git's excellent performance
> and the much better support for SVN, which is important for us as we can
> slowly migrate from SVN->Git, while hgmercurial is still in the making
> (and Python's SVN->Hg switch is for instance waiting for it).

Yes, but beware of git-svn under Cygwin 1.5 - that works for svn+ssh:// URLs,
but https:// or file:// don't work well because the underdocumented gazillion of
dependencies piece of sh.. called apr does stupid things WRT temporary files
since the Cygwin Subversion 1.6 days. Cygwin's Subversion 1.5 fared better.

I'm not sure about msysgit or jgit projects, but for Cygwin you'll definitely
want to take the plunge and go for Cygwin 1.7 which is still in Beta (because
that allows you to remove a file and create a file with the same name, which
doesn't work with Cygwin 1.5).