From: Ivo Calado <ivocalado@embedded.ufcg.edu.br>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Doubt in implementations of mean loss interval at sender side
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:26:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4B861.7040107@embedded.ufcg.edu.br> (raw)
Hi folks,
In the patch #3 of the sender patches series, the algorithm that does
the calc of the mean loss interval suffers with the same problem that
Gerrit pointed at the receiver patches.
It considers if an interval is 2 RTT old, instead of 2 RTT long. But I
sent this code in this state anyway, because I want to ask how to solve
this problem.
I imagined that would be possible to check the loss interval length
upon receiving the feedback from the receiver that contains new loss
intervals option, and to compare this with previous loss intervals info
received.
With this correction I would be able to return the tx history back to
it's normal behavior, instead of keeping 2 RTT's of packets.
Any help/opinions about this?
Cheers,
Ivo
--
Ivo Augusto Andrade Rocha Calado
MSc. Candidate
Embedded Systems and Pervasive Computing Lab -
http://embedded.ufcg.edu.br
Systems and Computing Department - http://www.dsc.ufcg.edu.br
Electrical Engineering and Informatics Center -
http://www.ceei.ufcg.edu.br
Federal University of Campina Grande - http://www.ufcg.edu.br
PGP: 0x03422935
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-13 17:26 Ivo Calado [this message]
2009-10-20 5:09 ` Doubt in implementations of mean loss interval at sender side Gerrit Renker
2009-10-21 13:18 ` Ivo Calado
2009-10-28 15:33 ` Gerrit Renker
[not found] ` <425e6efa0911051101l2d86050ep1172a0e8abd915c3@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <425e6efa0911051543t7a57963bi589f736c49763a6@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <cb00fa210911051603w6fb8de32qd7ebf37ce78408f7@mail.gmail.com>
2009-11-06 0:05 ` Ivo Calado
2009-11-06 0:05 ` Ivo Calado
2009-11-09 6:09 ` Gerrit Renker
2009-11-09 6:09 ` Gerrit Renker
[not found] ` <425e6efa0911161125q236b13afx2a675b4c3edc97c5@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <cb00fa210911161207n5f255a16w1b750701c1bd177c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-11-16 20:09 ` Ivo Calado
2009-11-16 20:09 ` Ivo Calado
2009-11-23 6:35 ` Gerrit Renker
2009-11-23 6:35 ` Gerrit Renker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD4B861.7040107@embedded.ufcg.edu.br \
--to=ivocalado@embedded.ufcg.edu.br \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.