From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anteru Subject: Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:50:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4AE000B7.4090708@shelter13.net> References: Reply-To: newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Dilip M X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 22 08:59:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N0reG-00013S-1M for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:59:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752336AbZJVG7d (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:59:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751980AbZJVG7d (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:59:33 -0400 Received: from smtprelay10.ispgateway.de ([80.67.29.24]:43228 "EHLO smtprelay10.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbZJVG7d (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:59:33 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 544 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:59:33 EDT Received: from [87.160.6.66] (helo=[10.13.37.2]) by smtprelay10.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1N0rSR-0000pW-RU; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:47:35 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 X-Df-Sender: 321503 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dilip M schrieb: > Hi Anteru, > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Anteru wrote: > > ..snip.. > >> So far, my key arguments are that git is more robust (more projects using >> it, larger developer base), of course git's excellent performance and the >> much better support for SVN, which is important for us as we can slowly >> migrate from SVN->Git, while hgmercurial is still in the making (and >> Python's SVN->Hg switch is for instance waiting for it). > > So finally which you choosed? Just curious? Bzr, it has even better SVN interop, works the same across all platforms, performance-wise, Bzr 2.x turned out to be more than sufficient and the UI tools are quite polished. Thanks for all the comments on Git and Hg! Cheers, Anteru