From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eyal Lebedinsky Subject: Re: mismatch_cnt again Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:19:35 +1100 Message-ID: <4AF5F277.4040309@eyal.emu.id.au> References: <4AF4C247.6050303@eyal.emu.id.au> <4AF4D323.6020108@panix.com> <4AF5268D.60900@eyal.emu.id.au> <4877c76c0911070008m789507f8h799d419287740ca5@mail.gmail.com> <87tyx6tpcb.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <4AF58B20.3000409@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AF58B20.3000409@redhat.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid list List-Id: linux-raid.ids Doug Ledford wrote: [trim] > And actually, with 1TB drives, your most likely culprit for this is the > last item I just listed: reallocated drive sectors. [trim] I did say "smart shows no issues with the disks". This means, naturally, no reallocated count/events on any of the 5 drives. -- Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au)