All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Schut <schut@sarvision.nl>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 6 Failure follow up
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:46:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFAB231.6020306@sarvision.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFAAF42.2000503@gmail.com>

Andrew Dunn wrote:
> Thanks for your help, so far without smartctl installed I have had no
> issues... but it has only been about 12 hours.
I also had no issues when not running smartd/smartctl. It seems the 
combination of kernel, backplane SAS driver, and smart which triggers 
the trouble...
> 
> Could you send me your smatd.conf?

It's pretty much default, there's just one uncommented line in it:

DEVICESCAN -d scsi -a -o on -S on -s (S/../.././02|L/../../6/03) -W 
4,45,55 -R 5 -m my@mail.address -M exec 
/usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner

(the above 3 lines should be all on one line).
I plan to replace the devicescan with explicit /dev/sd.. items, but as 
I'm currently regularly adding and removing (usb) drives, I kept the 
auto devicescan statement.
The rest means: enable smart on all drives, plan daily short and weekly 
long selftests, and warn on temperature too high or temp change of more 
than 5 deg., and mail warnings/errors to me.

VS.
> 
> Vincent Schut wrote:
>> Andrew Dunn wrote:
>>> I am able to reproduce this smart error now. I have done it twice, so
>>> maybe other things are causing this also.
>>>
>>> When I scanned the devices this morning with smartctl via webmin I lost
>>> 8 of the 9 drives. They are howerver still in my /dev folder.
>>>
>>> Now I sent out my logs from the first failure last night, smartctl was
>>> on the system... I dont know if ubuntu server's default smartd
>>> configuration makes it do periodic scans because I didnt change
>>> anything.
>>>
>>> I would hate to move back to 9.10 and see this problem again.
>>>
>>> Should I just not install smartmontools? This seems like a bad solution
>>> because now I wont be able to check the drives in advance for failures.
>>>
>>> Have you installed LSI's linux drivers? Some people say this solves
>>> their issue.
>>>
>>> From the logs sent out last night do you think it could be something
>>> else?
>>>
>>> Thanks a ton,
>> FWIW, I encountered the same issue, and seem to have found a viable
>> workaround by accessing the SATA disks on that LSI backplane as scsi
>> devices, e.g. by adding '-d scsi' to my smartctl/smartd.conf lines. No
>> more errors in the logs, no more drives being kicked out.
>> Though not as much info is available that way as when using de sata
>> driver ('-d sat', or automatically), like temperature is unavailable,
>> it does allow me to initiate the selftests and get their result, and
>> to monitor generic smart status of the drives. Quite enough for me.
>>
>> YMMV, though.
>>
>> Vincent.
>>> Gabor Gombas wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Andrew Dunn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>> does it momentarily offline the disks? like they re-appear in /dev
>>>>> within moments? That would be similar behavior to what I am
>>>>> experiencing, the disks drop from the array, but they are in /dev
>>>>> by the
>>>>> time I get a chance to see them.
>>>>>     
>>>> No, either the disks need to be physically removed and re-inserted, or
>>>> the machine needs to be rebooted.
>>>>
>>>> Gabor
>>>>
>>>>   
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-11 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-08 14:07 RAID 6 Failure follow up Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 14:23 ` Roger Heflin
2009-11-08 14:30   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 18:01     ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-08 18:22       ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 18:34         ` Joe Landman
2009-11-08 22:09       ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 22:59         ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-09  2:45           ` Ryan Wagoner
2009-11-09  2:57             ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-09  8:09             ` Gabor Gombas
2009-11-09 10:08               ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-09 11:34                 ` Gabor Gombas
2009-11-09 22:04                   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-10 10:55                   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-10 11:34                     ` Vincent Schut
2009-11-11 12:34                       ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-11 12:46                         ` Vincent Schut [this message]
2009-11-17  8:40                       ` Vincent Schut
2009-11-10 12:45                     ` Ryan Wagoner
2009-11-08 14:36   ` Andrew Dunn
2009-11-08 14:56     ` Roger Heflin
2009-11-08 17:08       ` Andrew Dunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AFAB231.6020306@sarvision.nl \
    --to=schut@sarvision.nl \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.