From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758059AbZLIVS6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:18:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756198AbZLIVSx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:18:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44021 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755011AbZLIVSx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:18:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4B201428.9060701@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:18:32 -0500 From: Rik van Riel Organization: Red Hat, Inc User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-3.9.b4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh CC: Dan Merillat , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Norbert Preining , Tomasz Chmielewski , Sven-Haegar Koch , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.31 - very swap-happy with plenty of free RAM References: <2f11576a0911190636vd21069bv2fe4f22a57b3d333@mail.gmail.com> <4B0DDFDA.1030905@redhat.com> <20091209204803.GD29575@khazad-dum.debian.net> In-Reply-To: <20091209204803.GD29575@khazad-dum.debian.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/2009 03:48 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Dan Merillat wrote: >>>> Can you try out the patch from >>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/25/467 ? >> >> After a week of testing, that seems to have been the issue, thanks! > > In that case, is that patch being considered for stable@ ? That may be an option, after Andrew has submitted the patch to Linus for 2.6.33, which he typically does towards the end of the merge window. I will certainly ask the Fedora kernel maintainers to take the patch in for their 2.6.32 based kernel. -- All rights reversed.