From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.juropnet.hu ([212.24.188.131]:41415 "EHLO mail.juropnet.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752312Ab0AGVFa (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:05:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4B464D21.2040404@mailbox.hu> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:07:45 +0100 From: "istvan_v@mailbox.hu" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Heitmueller CC: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DTV2000 H Plus issues References: <4B3F6FE0.4040307@internode.on.net> <4B3F7B0D.4030601@mailbox.hu> <4B405381.9090407@internode.on.net> <4B421BCB.6050909@mailbox.hu> <4B4294FE.8000309@internode.on.net> <4B463AC6.2000901@mailbox.hu> <829197381001071200n2100df65h84028042ffd4dd11@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <829197381001071200n2100df65h84028042ffd4dd11@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/07/2010 09:00 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > Could you please do me a favor and rename your firmware file, both in > the patch and the file you are redistributing (perhaps as > dvb-fe-xc4000-1.4.1-istanv.fw)? I worry that by redistributing a file > with the exact same name as the "official" release, people are going > to get confused and it will make it harder for me to debug problems > given my assumptions about what firmware image they are using is > incorrect. OK, I have renamed the firmware file. The download links are now: http://www.sharemation.com/IstvanV/v4l/dtv2000h+.patch http://www.sharemation.com/IstvanV/v4l/xc4000-dtv2000hp-1.4.1.fw