From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA write Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:55:05 +0900 Message-ID: <4B56A8C9.2000807@gmail.com> References: <20100116235653.898098245@gmail.com> <20100116235851.884756038@gmail.com> <4B5678E2.2050709@gmail.com> <7eb6a4d81001192244k19d28805p9cb4eaec7eed9366@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:32973 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751318Ab0ATGtA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:49:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7eb6a4d81001192244k19d28805p9cb4eaec7eed9366@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Hartgers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, juergen.metzdorf@telelev-dsl.de, markpschool@hotmail.com, sporadic.crash@gmail.com, apopov@sirma.bg, david@coomber.co.za, jay4mail@gmail.com Hello, On 01/20/2010 03:44 PM, Bart Hartgers wrote: > Yes, you're right. I'll drop the printk_once and send another patch > for inclusion. However, for testing I found it very useful to make > sure that I got the right module loaded. So I figured it could be > helpful for the interpretation of success/failure reports. Oh yeah, for testing, having it there is a good idea. > Assuming that this patch works for other people as well, what is > prefered: resending both patches or just to make a new #2/2 (the > vt6420 one)? I think just re-doing the second patch should be enough. Thanks. -- tejun