From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZWGe-0007Lh-Qi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:14:40 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZWGa-0007Hy-Ev for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:14:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58704 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZWGa-0007Hq-7j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:14:36 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.211.176]:36900) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZWGZ-0004ko-W1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:14:36 -0500 Received: by ywh6 with SMTP id 6so3487351ywh.4 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:14:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B5E09B8.8030809@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:14:32 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Support --sysconfdir in configure to specify path to configuration files (v3) References: <1264342938-7363-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1264342938-7363-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4B5C65D7.5040304@codemonkey.ws> <4B5DADFE.8050606@redhat.com> <4B5E07B4.4090205@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B5E07B4.4090205@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/25/2010 03:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>>> I'm not sure about the choice for Windows. Do we want possibly a >>>> dozen of .conf files all in the same directory as the binaries, or >>>> maybe it's better to set sysconfdir = ${prefix}/conf, >>>> confdir=${sysconfdir} on Windows? >>> >>> I honestly don't know. What's the normal thing to do with Windows? >> >> The registry, I think. > > The registry would be used indeed to get the path or to override > defaults. However, what would be the default value (written in the > registry by the installer, or used by the program if the registry > value is absent)? ini-style configs are not at all uncommon on Windows. I also don't think it's that uncommon to store executables and config files side-by-side in a Program Files directory. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Paolo