From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ngfks-0006nA-Ab for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:47:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37786 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ngfkr-0006mi-Rz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:47:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ngfkp-0006MS-AN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:47:25 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com ([209.85.220.223]:59152) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ngfkp-0006MG-19 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:47:23 -0500 Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so2910213fxm.22 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:47:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4B780CF6.3060505@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:47:18 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B77E6CF.7000901@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Give sdl-config higher priority than pkg-config List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Jacob Meuser , qemu-devel > Right. I think this patch against ports/devel/sdl should do the trick: > > --- patches/patch-sdl_pc_in.orig Sun Feb 14 14:08:41 2010 > +++ patches/patch-sdl_pc_in Sun Feb 14 14:10:50 2010 > @@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ > -Libs: -L${libdir} @SDL_RLD_FLAGS@ @SDL_LIBS@ > -Cflags: -I${includedir}/SDL @SDL_CFLAGS@ > +Libs: -L${libdir} @SDL_RLD_FLAGS@ @SDL_LIBS@ @X_LIBS@ > -+Cflags: -I${includedir}/SDL @SDL_CFLAGS@ @X_CFLAGS@ > ++Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/SDL @SDL_CFLAGS@ @X_CFLAGS@ Yep, thanks very much. Paolo