From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Schmidt Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:40:39 +0000 Subject: Re: PATCH: Access priority Message-Id: <4B7B10D7.10303@yahoo.com.au> List-Id: References: <4B5D7A55.4090302@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4B5D7A55.4090302@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org > One possible solution - at least to the bypass moderation problem - > might be to add another keyword. We could add "send" to force the mail > past normal moderation procedures. Exactly what I was thinking after reading the issues you raised above. > I know it does not fix the meaning of "allow" vs. "moderate" on lists > which are also subject to regular moderation, but I don't see a way to > do that without breaking backwards compatibility. It wouldn't be too big a problem--if it were documented. But it isn't, so the current behaviour is just unexpected, and I would say wrong. At least if it's documented, it's unexpected if you don't read the docs, but right. Shall I put together a new patch? Ben.