All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/3] o2net: correct keepalive message protocol
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:50:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7C80C1.4060400@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7C7F94.206@oracle.com>

My understanding was that we'll also requeue after sending a keepalive.
As in, not wait for the response to requeue. But we'll still be smart about
it in the sense that not send a hb even if the nodes are communicating
otherwise.

Srinivas Eeda wrote:
> In old code a node cancels and re queues keep alive message when it 
> hears from the other node. If it didn't hear in 2 seconds, queued 
> message gets fired which sends a keep alive message. And a re queue 
> happens only after it hears from the other node.
>
> With the new change, a node sends keep alive every 2 seconds.
>
> Sunil Mushran wrote:
>> How will it double? The node will send a keepalive only if it has
>> not heard from the other node for 2 secs.
>>
>> Srinivas Eeda wrote:
>>> No harm, just doubles heartbeat messages which is not required at all.
>>>
>>> Sunil Mushran wrote:
>>>> What's the harm in leaving it in?
>>>>
>>>> Srinivas Eeda wrote:
>>>>> Each node that has this patch would send a 
>>>>> O2NET_MSG_KEEP_REQ_MAGIC every 2 seconds(default). So, nodes 
>>>>> without this patch would always receive a heartbeat message every 
>>>>> 2 seconds.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nodes without this patch will send(respond) with 
>>>>> O2NET_MSG_KEEP_RESP_MAGIC for every keep alive packet they 
>>>>> received. So nodes with this patch will always receive a response 
>>>>> message.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in a mixed setup, both nodes will always hear the heartbeat 
>>>>> from each other :).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> --Srini
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Joel Becker wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 08:51:11PM -0800, Srinivas Eeda wrote:
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>          case O2NET_MSG_KEEP_REQ_MAGIC:
>>>>>>> -            o2net_sendpage(sc, o2net_keep_resp,
>>>>>>> -                       sizeof(*o2net_keep_resp));
>>>>>>> +            /* Each node now sends keepalive message every
>>>>>>> +             * keepalive time interval. Hence no need for response
>>>>>>> +             */
>>>>>>>              goto out;
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>     You still have to send the response.  Think about a mixed
>>>>>> environment where some nodes have this fix and some do not.  The 
>>>>>> older
>>>>>> software is still waiting on the response.
>>>>>>     The newer version can just ignore any responses it gets from
>>>>>> other nodes.  But it has to send responses out just in case the 
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> node is older.
>>>>>>     The only other alternative is to bump the o2net protocol
>>>>>> version, and that means the cluster has to be shut down to 
>>>>>> upgrade.  Not
>>>>>> a good choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
>>>>> Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com
>>>>> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-17 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-29  4:51 [Ocfs2-devel] o2net patches Srinivas Eeda
2010-01-29  4:51 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] o2net: rollback reconnect on network timeout Srinivas Eeda
2010-01-29  4:51 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] o2net: delay enotconn for sends receives till quorum decision Srinivas Eeda
2010-01-29  4:51 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/3] o2net: correct keepalive message protocol Srinivas Eeda
2010-02-17  5:56   ` Joel Becker
2010-02-17 18:24     ` Srinivas Eeda
2010-02-17 22:40       ` Sunil Mushran
2010-02-17 22:52         ` Srinivas Eeda
2010-02-17 22:47           ` Sunil Mushran
2010-02-17 23:45             ` Srinivas Eeda
2010-02-17 23:50               ` Sunil Mushran [this message]
2010-02-18  0:59                 ` srinivas eeda
2010-02-18  1:08                   ` Sunil Mushran
2010-02-18  1:46                     ` srinivas eeda
2010-02-18  1:49       ` Joel Becker
2010-02-18  1:55         ` srinivas eeda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B7C80C1.4060400@oracle.com \
    --to=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.