From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753023Ab0CBBcW (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:32:22 -0500 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:59953 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751460Ab0CBBcV (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 20:32:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8C6AA4.8000700@goop.org> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:32:20 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sheng Yang CC: Keir Fraser , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Ian Pratt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7][v4] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen References: <1267436315-24486-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B8C5ED9.1040109@goop.org> <201003020926.03512.sheng@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <201003020926.03512.sheng@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/01/2010 05:26 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: >> Why 2.6.33? I'm currently working on 2.6.32; I intend to move to .33 >> shortly, but .32 is a much more convenient base (particularly if you're >> interested in getting these changes into any distro kernels). >> >> I rebased it to .32 without much effort. >> > OK. > Hm, looks like the x86_platform_ipi stuff is missing in .32. J From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v4] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:32:20 -0800 Message-ID: <4B8C6AA4.8000700@goop.org> References: <1267436315-24486-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B8C5ED9.1040109@goop.org> <201003020926.03512.sheng@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201003020926.03512.sheng@linux.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Sheng Yang Cc: xen-devel , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Pratt , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/01/2010 05:26 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: >> Why 2.6.33? I'm currently working on 2.6.32; I intend to move to .33 >> shortly, but .32 is a much more convenient base (particularly if you're >> interested in getting these changes into any distro kernels). >> >> I rebased it to .32 without much effort. >> > OK. > Hm, looks like the x86_platform_ipi stuff is missing in .32. J