All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, Chad Talbott <ctalbott@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nauman Rafique <nauman@google.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] io-controller: Add a new interface	"weight_device" for IO-Controller
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:31:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9050D2.2090203@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100304152400.GB18786@redhat.com>

Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:35:19PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>> Currently, IO Controller makes use of blkio.weight to assign weight for
>> all devices. Here a new user interface "blkio.weight_device" is introduced to 
>> assign different weights for different devices. blkio.weight becomes the
>> default value for devices which are not configured by "blkio.weight_device"
>>
>> You can use the following format to assigned specific weight for a given
>> device:
>> #echo "major:minor weight" > blkio.weight_device
>>
>> major:minor represents device number.
>>
>> And you can remove a specific weight as following:
>> #echo "major:minor 0" > blkio.weight_device
>>
>> V1->V2 changes:
>> - use user interface "weight_device" instead of "policy" suggested by Vivek
>> - rename some struct suggested by Vivek
>> - rebase to 2.6-block "for-linus" branch
>> - remove an useless list_empty check pointed out by Li Zefan
>> - some trivial typo fix
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-cgroup.c  |  240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  block/blk-cgroup.h  |   10 ++
>>  block/cfq-iosched.c |    2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> index c85d74c..37f1d8f 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/err.h>
>>  #include "blk-cgroup.h"
>> +#include <linux/genhd.h>
>>  
>>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(blkio_list_lock);
>>  static LIST_HEAD(blkio_list);
>> @@ -23,6 +24,12 @@ static LIST_HEAD(blkio_list);
>>  struct blkio_cgroup blkio_root_cgroup = { .weight = 2*BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT };
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkio_root_cgroup);
>>  
>> +static inline void policy_insert_node(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
>> +				      struct blkio_policy_node *pn);
>> +static inline void policy_delete_node(struct blkio_policy_node *pn);
>> +static struct blkio_policy_node *policy_search_node(const struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
>> +						 dev_t dev);
> 
> Hi Gui,
> 
> Thanks. Can we move above functions up in the file and get rid of these
> forward declarations?
> 
> Also as I suggested last time, it might be good idea to prefix "blkio_"
> before function names.
> 
> policy_insert_node ---> blkio_policy_insert_node()
> policy_delete_node ---> blkio_policy_delete_node()
> policy_search_node ---> blkio_policy_search_node()
> chekc_dev_num ---> blkio_check_dev_num()
> .
> .

Sure, will post again.

Thanks,
Gui

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
>> +
>>  struct blkio_cgroup *cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup)
>>  {
>>  	return container_of(cgroup_subsys_state(cgroup, blkio_subsys_id),
>> @@ -128,6 +135,7 @@ blkiocg_weight_write(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cftype, u64 val)
>>  	struct blkio_group *blkg;
>>  	struct hlist_node *n;
>>  	struct blkio_policy_type *blkiop;
>> +	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
>>  
>>  	if (val < BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN || val > BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -136,7 +144,13 @@ blkiocg_weight_write(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct cftype *cftype, u64 val)
>>  	spin_lock(&blkio_list_lock);
>>  	spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>>  	blkcg->weight = (unsigned int)val;
>> +
>>  	hlist_for_each_entry(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node) {
>> +		pn = policy_search_node(blkcg, blkg->dev);
>> +
>> +		if (pn)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>>  		list_for_each_entry(blkiop, &blkio_list, list)
>>  			blkiop->ops.blkio_update_group_weight_fn(blkg,
>>  					blkcg->weight);
>> @@ -185,8 +199,227 @@ void blkiocg_update_blkio_group_dequeue_stats(struct blkio_group *blkg,
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkiocg_update_blkio_group_dequeue_stats);
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +static int check_dev_num(dev_t dev)
>> +{
>> +	int part = 0;
>> +	struct gendisk *disk;
>> +
>> +	disk = get_gendisk(dev, &part);
>> +	if (!disk || part)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int policy_parse_and_set(char *buf, struct blkio_policy_node *newpn)
>> +{
>> +	char *s[4], *p, *major_s = NULL, *minor_s = NULL;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	unsigned long major, minor, temp;
>> +	int i = 0;
>> +	dev_t dev;
>> +
>> +	memset(s, 0, sizeof(s));
>> +
>> +	while ((p = strsep(&buf, " ")) != NULL) {
>> +		if (!*p)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		s[i++] = p;
>> +
>> +		/* Prevent from inputing too many things */
>> +		if (i == 3)
>> +			break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (i != 2)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	p = strsep(&s[0], ":");
>> +	if (p != NULL)
>> +		major_s = p;
>> +	else
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	minor_s = s[0];
>> +	if (!minor_s)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	ret = strict_strtoul(major_s, 10, &major);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	ret = strict_strtoul(minor_s, 10, &minor);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	dev = MKDEV(major, minor);
>> +
>> +	ret = check_dev_num(dev);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	newpn->dev = dev;
>> +
>> +	if (s[1] == NULL)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	ret = strict_strtoul(s[1], 10, &temp);
>> +	if (ret || (temp < BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN && temp > 0) ||
>> +	    temp > BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	newpn->weight =  temp;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned int blkcg_get_weight(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
>> +				    dev_t dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
>> +
>> +	pn = policy_search_node(blkcg, dev);
>> +	if (pn)
>> +		return pn->weight;
>> +	else
>> +		return blkcg->weight;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkcg_get_weight);
>> +
>> +static inline void policy_insert_node(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
>> +				      struct blkio_policy_node *pn)
>> +{
>> +	list_add(&pn->node, &blkcg->policy_list);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Must be called with blkcg->lock held */
>> +static inline void policy_delete_node(struct blkio_policy_node *pn)
>> +{
>> +	list_del(&pn->node);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Must be called with blkcg->lock held */
>> +static struct blkio_policy_node *policy_search_node(const struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
>> +						 dev_t dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(pn, &blkcg->policy_list, node) {
>> +		if (pn->dev == dev)
>> +			return pn;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static int blkiocg_weight_device_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
>> +				const char *buffer)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	char *buf;
>> +	struct blkio_policy_node *newpn, *pn;
>> +	struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg;
>> +	struct blkio_group *blkg;
>> +	int keep_newpn = 0;
>> +	struct hlist_node *n;
>> +	struct blkio_policy_type *blkiop;
>> +
>> +	buf = kstrdup(buffer, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!buf)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	newpn = kzalloc(sizeof(*newpn), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!newpn) {
>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto free_buf;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = policy_parse_and_set(buf, newpn);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto free_newpn;
>> +
>> +	blkcg = cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup(cgrp);
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +
>> +	pn = policy_search_node(blkcg, newpn->dev);
>> +	if (!pn) {
>> +		if (newpn->weight != 0) {
>> +			policy_insert_node(blkcg, newpn);
>> +			keep_newpn = 1;
>> +		}
>> +		spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +		goto update_io_group;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (newpn->weight == 0) {
>> +		/* weight == 0 means deleteing a specific weight */
>> +		policy_delete_node(pn);
>> +		spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +		goto update_io_group;
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +
>> +	pn->weight = newpn->weight;
>> +
>> +update_io_group:
>> +	/* update weight for each cfqg */
>> +	spin_lock(&blkio_list_lock);
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +
>> +	hlist_for_each_entry(blkg, n, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node) {
>> +		if (newpn->dev == blkg->dev) {
>> +			list_for_each_entry(blkiop, &blkio_list, list)
>> +				blkiop->ops.blkio_update_group_weight_fn(blkg,
>> +						newpn->weight ?
>> +						newpn->weight :
>> +						blkcg->weight);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +	spin_unlock(&blkio_list_lock);
>> +
>> +free_newpn:
>> +	if (!keep_newpn)
>> +		kfree(newpn);
>> +free_buf:
>> +	kfree(buf);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int blkiocg_weight_device_read(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
>> +				       struct seq_file *m)
>> +{
>> +	struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg;
>> +	struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
>> +
>> +	seq_printf(m, "dev\tweight\n");
>> +
>> +	blkcg = cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup(cgrp);
>> +	if (list_empty(&blkcg->policy_list))
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +	list_for_each_entry(pn, &blkcg->policy_list, node) {
>> +		seq_printf(m, "%u:%u\t%u\n", MAJOR(pn->dev),
>> +			   MINOR(pn->dev), pn->weight);
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
>> +out:
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  struct cftype blkio_files[] = {
>>  	{
>> +		.name = "weight_device",
>> +		.read_seq_string = blkiocg_weight_device_read,
>> +		.write_string = blkiocg_weight_device_write,
>> +		.max_write_len = 256,
>> +	},
>> +	{
>>  		.name = "weight",
>>  		.read_u64 = blkiocg_weight_read,
>>  		.write_u64 = blkiocg_weight_write,
>> @@ -220,6 +453,7 @@ static void blkiocg_destroy(struct cgroup_subsys *subsys, struct cgroup *cgroup)
>>  	struct blkio_group *blkg;
>>  	void *key;
>>  	struct blkio_policy_type *blkiop;
>> +	struct blkio_policy_node *pn, *pntmp;
>>  
>>  	rcu_read_lock();
>>  remove_entry:
>> @@ -250,7 +484,12 @@ remove_entry:
>>  		blkiop->ops.blkio_unlink_group_fn(key, blkg);
>>  	spin_unlock(&blkio_list_lock);
>>  	goto remove_entry;
>> +
>>  done:
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(pn, pntmp, &blkcg->policy_list, node) {
>> +		policy_delete_node(pn);
>> +		kfree(pn);
>> +	}
>>  	free_css_id(&blkio_subsys, &blkcg->css);
>>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>>  	kfree(blkcg);
>> @@ -280,6 +519,7 @@ done:
>>  	spin_lock_init(&blkcg->lock);
>>  	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&blkcg->blkg_list);
>>  
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&blkcg->policy_list);
>>  	return &blkcg->css;
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.h b/block/blk-cgroup.h
>> index 84bf745..c8144a2 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.h
>> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.h
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct blkio_cgroup {
>>  	unsigned int weight;
>>  	spinlock_t lock;
>>  	struct hlist_head blkg_list;
>> +	struct list_head policy_list; /* list of blkio_policy_node */
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct blkio_group {
>> @@ -43,6 +44,15 @@ struct blkio_group {
>>  	unsigned long sectors;
>>  };
>>  
>> +struct blkio_policy_node {
>> +	struct list_head node;
>> +	dev_t dev;
>> +	unsigned int weight;
>> +};
>> +
>> +extern unsigned int blkcg_get_weight(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
>> +				     dev_t dev);
>> +
>>  typedef void (blkio_unlink_group_fn) (void *key, struct blkio_group *blkg);
>>  typedef void (blkio_update_group_weight_fn) (struct blkio_group *blkg,
>>  						unsigned int weight);
>> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
>> index dee9d93..6945e9b 100644
>> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
>> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
>> @@ -954,7 +954,6 @@ cfq_find_alloc_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cgroup *cgroup, int create)
>>  	if (!cfqg)
>>  		goto done;
>>  
>> -	cfqg->weight = blkcg->weight;
>>  	for_each_cfqg_st(cfqg, i, j, st)
>>  		*st = CFQ_RB_ROOT;
>>  	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&cfqg->rb_node);
>> @@ -971,6 +970,7 @@ cfq_find_alloc_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cgroup *cgroup, int create)
>>  	sscanf(dev_name(bdi->dev), "%u:%u", &major, &minor);
>>  	blkiocg_add_blkio_group(blkcg, &cfqg->blkg, (void *)cfqd,
>>  					MKDEV(major, minor));
>> +	cfqg->weight = blkcg_get_weight(blkcg, cfqg->blkg.dev);
>>  
>>  	/* Add group on cfqd list */
>>  	hlist_add_head(&cfqg->cfqd_node, &cfqd->cfqg_list);
>> -- 
>> 1.5.4.rc3 
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-05  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03  6:21 [PATCH 2/1] io-controller: Add a new interface "policy" for IO Controller Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-03  9:01 ` Jens Axboe
2010-03-03 14:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-03 15:47   ` Vivek Goyal
     [not found]     ` <e98e18941003031519v14d4f79cg33da5c3cf1f5ac03@mail.gmail.com>
2010-03-04  2:25       ` Chad Talbott
2010-03-04  3:23         ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-04  7:35           ` [PATCH 1/2 V2] io-controller: Add a new interface "weight_device" for IO-Controller Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-04 15:24             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-05  0:31               ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2010-03-05  2:25               ` [PATCH 1/2 V3] " Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-05 14:13                 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-08 19:39                   ` Nauman Rafique
2010-03-08 23:09                     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-09  1:52                       ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-09 19:03                         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-10  0:33                           ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-10  5:41                             ` Chad Talbott
2010-03-10 15:30                             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-10 17:38                               ` Chad Talbott
2010-03-10 18:03                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-10 20:31                                   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-11 19:21                                     ` Manuel Benitez
2010-03-15 13:55                                       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-09 20:16                     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-09 20:39                       ` Nauman Rafique
2010-03-25  6:28                   ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-04-07 17:12                     ` Chad Talbott
2010-04-07 17:28                       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08  0:11                         ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-05  2:26               ` [PATCH 2/2 V3] io-controller: Document for blkio.weight_device Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-05  2:44                 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-03-05  2:42                   ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-05 14:13                 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-04  7:35           ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] " Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-04 11:22             ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-03-05  0:38               ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-04 15:06         ` [PATCH 2/1] io-controller: Add a new interface "policy" for IO Controller Vivek Goyal
2010-03-04  0:27   ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-03-03 15:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-04  0:29   ` Gui Jianfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B9050D2.2090203@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.