From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966298Ab0CPOTT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:19:19 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([143.182.124.36]:42261 "EHLO azsmga102.ch.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966283Ab0CPOTP (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:19:15 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,650,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="255225107" Message-ID: <4B9F9361.6060208@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:19:13 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Renninger CC: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Robert_Sch=F6ne?= , Dave Jones , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , cpufreq , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (for Intel x86 CPUs) References: <1268399863.3407.15.camel@localhost> <201003151151.05741.trenn@suse.de> <1268723628.3367.16.camel@localhost> <201003161159.24424.trenn@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <201003161159.24424.trenn@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > But something else...: > What exactly is the power tracer good for and what is it > capable of which cpufreq_stats is not capable to do? look at timechart for example..... it's extremely useful to have this for us that do power tuning... cpufreq_stats is nice but not nearly good enough since you only get averages, not time behavior.