From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Timo_Ter=E4s?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: cache bundle lookup results in flow cache Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:31:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4BA7B766.7070106@iki.fi> References: <20100322013257.GA14080@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100321.183656.173864141.davem@davemloft.net> <20100322014010.GA14182@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100321.201258.184825751.davem@davemloft.net> <20100322035241.GB14457@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com ([209.85.219.216]:37272 "EHLO mail-ew0-f216.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754687Ab0CVSbJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:31:09 -0400 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so303154ewy.28 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:31:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100322035241.GB14457@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 08:12:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> Good point, I was misunderstanding how things work now and how >> that would change with your proposal. >> >> Having multiple xfrm_dsts exist for an IPSEC route seems fine >> to me. > > Thanks for the confirmation. > > Timo, let's roll along with the per-cpu xfrm_dst approach. Okay. - Timo