From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752879Ab0CZJn3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:43:29 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:46448 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751743Ab0CZJn1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:43:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WchzwYHOvuIaBSHVGUCHuZjKGMzeol85AcADQ2f18gl8DDq9p8q6fj2bblfS6qna6n R387ni0S5rrkanHgaSCEdH0OyxHrY5WfUv/aiVMD2jRPCmjI8zmz1U3MnLbN/pQ5vscH mN1XAqdxT1umS0W52lkCMmdijCxoKZwHzNXwk= Message-ID: <4BAC81BB.9030606@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:43:23 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.2.2pre) Gecko/20100308 SUSE/3.1b1-6.1 Thunderbird/3.1b1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: pavel@ucw.cz, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [RFC 08/15] PM / Hibernate: add user module_ops References: <1269361063-3341-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <1269361063-3341-8-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <201003252307.15232.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201003252307.15232.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/25/2010 11:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Add sws_module_ops into /dev/snapshot user interface, so far only with >> .storage_available. The structure will be shortly filled while converting >> it to ops. >> >> Also, when using this interface, switch to the ops on open/release. > > Quite frankly, I don't really understand the purpose of this change in this > particular form. It looks like it may be folded into one of the subsequent > changes just fine. Yup, maybe the single-change-per-patch approach was overzealous here. Squashed to 09/15. thanks, -- js