From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Xen's use of PAT and PV guests Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:55:06 -0700 Message-ID: <4BB37E6A.3040305@goop.org> References: <4BB1476D.4060209@goop.org> <1269971775.2490.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4BB2715B.7020604@goop.org> <1270024267.10129.72461.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1270024267.10129.72461.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: Xen-devel , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/31/2010 01:31 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > I was referring to my patch which wasn't at all hidden away in the Xen > code. Anyway I've found and attached it for your amusement, it's not > nearly as fully baked as I remembered ;-) In my defence the date stamp > on the patch file is May 2009... > Urk, yeah, that's going to be much harder to make fly. Conversion at the make_pte/pte_val level gets us most of way there with less intrusion. J