From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932781Ab0DHQPu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:15:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.gb1.humyo.com ([62.44.71.171]:58253 "EHLO mx1.gb1.humyo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932532Ab0DHQPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4BBE01CB.9020701@humyo.com> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:18:19 +0100 From: John Berthels User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Gregory , Rob Sanderson , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64 References: <4BBC6719.7080304@humyo.com> <20100407140523.GJ11036@dastard> <4BBCAB57.3000106@humyo.com> <20100407234341.GK11036@dastard> <20100408030347.GM11036@dastard> <4BBDC92D.8060503@humyo.com> <4BBDEC9A.9070903@humyo.com> In-Reply-To: <4BBDEC9A.9070903@humyo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org John Berthels wrote: > John Berthels wrote: >> I'll reply again after it's been running long enough to draw >> conclusions. The box with patch+THREAD_ORDER 1+LOCKDEP went down (with no further logging retrievable by /var/log/messages or netconsole). We're loading up a 2.6.33.2 + patch + THREAD_ORDER 2 (no LOCKDEP) to get better info as to whether we are still blowing the 8k limit with the patch in place. jb From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o38GDvV6032388 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:13:57 -0500 Received: from mx1.gb1.humyo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A5B0C1AC12A3 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.gb1.humyo.com (mx1.gb1.humyo.com [62.44.71.171]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id NBb07IPkjKFoCyDh for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BBE01CB.9020701@humyo.com> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:18:19 +0100 From: John Berthels MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64 References: <4BBC6719.7080304@humyo.com> <20100407140523.GJ11036@dastard> <4BBCAB57.3000106@humyo.com> <20100407234341.GK11036@dastard> <20100408030347.GM11036@dastard> <4BBDC92D.8060503@humyo.com> <4BBDEC9A.9070903@humyo.com> In-Reply-To: <4BBDEC9A.9070903@humyo.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Nick Gregory , linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Sanderson John Berthels wrote: > John Berthels wrote: >> I'll reply again after it's been running long enough to draw >> conclusions. The box with patch+THREAD_ORDER 1+LOCKDEP went down (with no further logging retrievable by /var/log/messages or netconsole). We're loading up a 2.6.33.2 + patch + THREAD_ORDER 2 (no LOCKDEP) to get better info as to whether we are still blowing the 8k limit with the patch in place. jb _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4273600337 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BBE01CB.9020701@humyo.com> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:18:19 +0100 From: John Berthels MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64 References: <4BBC6719.7080304@humyo.com> <20100407140523.GJ11036@dastard> <4BBCAB57.3000106@humyo.com> <20100407234341.GK11036@dastard> <20100408030347.GM11036@dastard> <4BBDC92D.8060503@humyo.com> <4BBDEC9A.9070903@humyo.com> In-Reply-To: <4BBDEC9A.9070903@humyo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Gregory , Rob Sanderson , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: John Berthels wrote: > John Berthels wrote: >> I'll reply again after it's been running long enough to draw >> conclusions. The box with patch+THREAD_ORDER 1+LOCKDEP went down (with no further logging retrievable by /var/log/messages or netconsole). We're loading up a 2.6.33.2 + patch + THREAD_ORDER 2 (no LOCKDEP) to get better info as to whether we are still blowing the 8k limit with the patch in place. jb -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org