From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O1Ey7-0003bG-R4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:26:07 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44495 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O1Ey5-0003ZP-9Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:26:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1Ey3-0000S6-MD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:26:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1Ey3-0000Rs-DP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:26:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4BC2D8EE.8070201@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:25:18 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for 0.12.4 References: <20100408183706.GA6046@volta.aurel32.net> <20100410205255.GP17204@hall.aurel32.net> <20100411085136.GQ17204@hall.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <20100411085136.GQ17204@hall.aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Gerhard Wiesinger , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann Am 11.04.2010 10:51, schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:25:50AM +0200, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:08:45PM +0200, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: >>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> A number of fixes have been accumulated in the stable-0.12 branch, and >>>>> I think it's time to release a new stable version. I would like to see >>>>> that happening for the end of next week (around the 18th of April). >>>>> >>>>> If you want to see some patches included, please send a mail to the >>>>> mailing list with the [STABLE] tag. I would clearly prefer patches that >>>>> are already in HEAD (if the patch can simply be cherry-picked, there is >>>>> no need to send a patch, just the commit number), though other patches >>>>> might be considered too. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Would be nice to backport the SCSI "crash&boot" patches. (was recently on >>>> the list, if you need more infos let me know, already commited). >>>> >>> >>> Can you please point me to the corresponding patches? Do they apply >>> directly to stable? >> >> No problem, last 6 patches from Gerd Hoffmann from: >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/log/hw/lsi53c895a.c >> >> Details: >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=6ac08101f9de84be1fb7b45f87caed8ba8f3eb5a >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=aa4d32c4742e62e09786bd1067a5b98239867e93 >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=b96a0da06bd782ef290445479a6d4d0de00c2c23 >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=daa70311e0f7b37cd0ea3c4de0d163ccf1a36abe >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=af12ac9880eacdd79d49a11d5672df7170afb38f >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/qemu.git/commit/?id=042ec49dc52e54153942a089a46ae584152998fb >> >> At least for the 0.12.3 release they work well (merged & tested). Don't >> know about release branch (maybe something has already been merged). >> > > There is a lot of code refactoring in those patches, I am not sure we > really want that in stable. Would it be possible to extract only the > real fixes from those patches? These patches should all be in master already and seem to work reliably there. Cherry-picking them as a whole into stable is probably safer than cooking up a different fix which might have its own problems. Kevin