From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reflog: ignore expire-unreachable for "HEAD" reflog Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:08:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4BC7FECA.2010202@viscovery.net> References: <7vljcppycc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vfx2xpyam.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4BC6B5FF.6030406@viscovery.net> <7vochlkvtg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4BC6D30F.5020004@viscovery.net> <7v4ojclwyu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4BC70D75.70801@viscovery.net> <20100415163607.GA4279@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 16 08:08:22 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2ej0-000774-J4 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:08:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753579Ab0DPGIQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:08:16 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:54351 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753485Ab0DPGIP (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:08:15 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2eio-0007nZ-PJ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:08:10 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E65D1660F; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:08:10 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <20100415163607.GA4279@coredump.intra.peff.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 4/15/2010 18:36, schrieb Jeff King: > I think it is because the reachability test is defined as "from the > current ref". Thanks, this clears my confusion. I see the problem that Junio wants to fix, but IMHO this: > I think another way of addressing the same problem would be to redefine > "reachable" in this context as "reachable from any current ref". would be a better approach for a fix rather than an exception for HEAD. -- Hannes