From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754614Ab0DVR0y (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:26:54 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:44770 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752760Ab0DVR0x (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:26:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4BD086D0.9090309@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:26:40 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Alex Shi , yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com, tj@kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >> know (either way). > > I have not been able to reproduce it so far. So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now but I still can't see what's wrong with it... Pekka From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:26:40 +0300 Message-ID: <4BD086D0.9090309@cs.helsinki.fi> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Alex Shi , yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team >> know (either way). > > I have not been able to reproduce it so far. So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now but I still can't see what's wrong with it... Pekka