From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753545Ab0ESPqe (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 11:46:34 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:35873 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753457Ab0ESPqc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 11:46:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF407C9.2020202@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:46:17 +0200 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: "John W. Linville" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] wireless: update gfp/slab.h includes References: <1269885165-18617-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1269885165-18617-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20100519190230.52385a65.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100519144505.GD2412@tuxdriver.com> <20100520012829.709931dc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20100520012829.709931dc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 19 May 2010 15:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, John, Stephen. On 05/19/2010 05:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Looks like this was part of a series...who merged the rest of it? >> I guess I presumed they would take care of the series. Most of the series have been applied circa 2.6.34-rc4. Stephen has been carrying patches for branches which weren't yet in mainline. IOW, these patches are necessary for a branch to be merged into mainline. > It was a series of patches that were only relevant to the trees in > linux-next (for a change that happened in Linus' tree). My hope (and I > assume Tejun's) was that each maintainer would take the patch relevant to > their tree (some did - I just checked I still have 10 of them being > applied to linux-next :-(). Yeap, I hoped that more of them would sort themselves out during devel cycle, but I guess rc1 window isn't too bad. Thank you. -- tejun