From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hermes.mlbassoc.com ([76.76.67.137] helo=mail.chez-thomas.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJlks-0006Qd-RG for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:05:26 +0200 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id CCB3E16607B3; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:00:48 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5DD166073B; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:00:48 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4C0639E0.40708@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:00:48 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C04F6FD.4070804@mlbassoc.com> <201006011647.23770.ml@vdm-design.de> <4C052584.2040905@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.76.67.137 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gary@mlbassoc.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Is Angstrom dead? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:05:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/01/2010 06:30 PM, Graham Gower wrote: > On 2 June 2010 00:51, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >> I reran my build and it passed through (no repository changes). >> This particular problem seems to be a multi-threaded build (I run >> with BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "4") >> >> Sadly, the final image still does not build: >> >> | log_check: Matched keyword: [Cannot satisfy the following dependencies] >> | Collected errors: >> | * resolve_conffiles: Existing conffile >> /local/Angstrom_BeagleBoard/tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image/etc/device_table >> is different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be >> placed at /local/Angstrom_BeagleBoard/tmp/rootfs/b * >> satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for >> angstrom-task-gnome: >> | * encodings * encodings * encodings * >> | >> NOTE: package beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: >> Failed >> >> I don't understand this error well enough (believe me, I've >> spent hours reading the various recipes and trying things) >> to hazard a guess as to what this error means. >> > > Not understanding the error is probably because most of this error > message comes from opkg (which is a heap of crap) and part of it has > been truncated. > > The first bit: >> | * resolve_conffiles: Existing conffile >> /local/Angstrom_BeagleBoard/tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image/etc/device_table >> is different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be >> placed at /local/Angstrom_BeagleBoard/tmp/rootfs/b > > This indicates that multiple packages are trying to provide the > /etc/device_table config file. The message has been truncated at 256 > chars - even the '\n' has been stripped so it runs on to the next > error. > > I've just bumped this limit to 4096 in upstream opkg, so longer errors > should be more readable. Yes, your change improved the readability of the messages, thanks. That said, I'm not sure that this first part is such a problem as it also happens when building 'beagleboard-demo-image' that does succeed. Looking at the results, I see these files: $ \ls tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-*-image/etc/device_table* -l -rw-rw-r-- 1 gthomas gthomas 1378 Jun 1 07:37 tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-demo-image/etc/device_table -rwxr-xr-x 1 gthomas gthomas 6666 May 22 21:17 tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-demo-image/etc/device_table-opkg -rw-rw-r-- 1 gthomas gthomas 1378 Jun 2 04:35 tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image/etc/device_table -rwxr-xr-x 1 gthomas gthomas 6666 May 22 21:17 tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image/etc/device_table-opkg This implies that the same conditions exist for both beagleboard-demo-image and beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image, so I'm not sure why in one case the error checker catches it and the other not. > >> satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for >> angstrom-task-gnome: >> | * encodings * encodings * encodings * > > Package "angstrom-task-gnome" depends on Package "encodings", but it > cannot be found in the list of available packages. I have no idea why > its listed three times. I also don't understand this one as those packages are most certainly there: $ tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/bin/opkg-cl -f tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image/etc/opkg/opkg.conf -o tmp/rootfs/beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image list 'encodings*' encodings - 1:1.0.3-r1.0.5 - Version 1.0.3-r1.0 of package encodings encodings-dbg - 1:1.0.3-r1.0.5 - Version 1.0.3-r1.0 of package encodings encodings-dev - 1:1.0.3-r1.0.5 - Version 1.0.3-r1.0 of package encodings What am I missing? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------