From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:53:13 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Kirkwood: Add support for OpenRD-Client &
	OpenRD-Ultimate
In-Reply-To: <1276161144-20204-1-git-send-email-tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com>
References: <no>
	<1276161144-20204-1-git-send-email-tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com>
Message-ID: <4C14C6A9.6000407@free.fr>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Le 10/06/2010 11:12, Tanmay Upadhyay a ?crit :

> This patch modifies existing OpenRD-Base support to deal with all
> the three OpenRD boards (OpenRD-Base, OpenRD-Client&  OpenRD-Ultimate).

Probably small detail: this patch replaces the @ by an <at> in the 
e-mail addresses (not only the patch author's). Is it a policy for 
submitting patches to u-boot that all e-mail addresses should be 
'obfuscated' so?

More important: I've tried running the resulting u-boot on my 
OpenRD-Client by TFTPing it to RAM (the default OpenRD-Client config has 
CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT defined and CONFIG_SKIP_RELACATION undefined). 
Doing a 'go' to the load address causes no visible output on the console 
and no sign of life at all -- I have to reset the board to get back to 
the FLASH u-boot. Anyone here had better luck with the OpenRD client config?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.