All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: ioremap: remove physical address warning message
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:06:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C158EC3.3010601@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C127604.6000203@zytor.com>

(2010/06/12 2:44), H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 02:20 AM, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>> Current ioremap() code for x86 displays warning message if too high
>> address to handle is passed. But this can happen as usual cases. For
>> example, if 64-bit BAR is assigned to a PCI device and its device
>> driver calls pci_iomap(). So this patch changes the warning messages
>> as follows.
>>
>> - Change printk message from KERN_WARNING to KERN_DEBUG
>> - Remove WARN_ON_ONCE()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige<kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c |    3 +--
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.34.orig/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c	2010-06-10 07:28:31.966187993 +0900
>> +++ linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c	2010-06-10 07:28:33.146375380 +0900
>> @@ -78,9 +78,8 @@
>>   		return NULL;
>>
>>   	if (!phys_addr_valid(phys_addr)) {
>> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "ioremap: invalid physical address %llx\n",
>> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "ioremap: can't map physical address %llx\n",
>>   		       (unsigned long long)phys_addr);
>> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>>   		return NULL;
>>   	}
>>
>
> Fair to change the message, but the priority level really seems way
> insufficient.  I can see dropping the WARN_ON_ONCE() though.
>

I think KERN_WARNING is a little too high because there is no action
user can take and there is no problem from the hardware/firmware point
of view. How about KERN_INFO instead?

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-14  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-11  9:17 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] x86: ioremap() problem in X86_32 PAE Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-11  9:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: ioremap: fix wrong address masking Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-11  9:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: ioremap: fix physical address check Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-11 17:43   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-14  0:18     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-14  8:59       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-14  9:13         ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14 11:06           ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14 18:36             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-15  2:21               ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14 20:16             ` Rolf Eike Beer
2010-06-15  2:33               ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14  1:54     ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14  6:38       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-06-14  8:23         ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14  9:02           ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14 15:40             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-14 15:11         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-14  8:27       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-14 15:12         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-11  9:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: ioremap: remove physical address warning message Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-11 17:44   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-14  2:06     ` Kenji Kaneshige [this message]
2010-06-11  9:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: ioremap: fix normal ram range check Kenji Kaneshige
2010-06-11 17:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] x86: ioremap() problem in X86_32 PAE H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C158EC3.3010601@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.