All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Cam Macdonell <cam@cs.ualberta.ca>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unusual physical address when using 64-bit BAR
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:04:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C175E30.2030605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikru9Ge2f2vr4dgi9Icn6D9THYiJmEb5-xpBIro@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/11/2010 08:31 PM, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Cam Macdonell<cam@cs.ualberta.ca>  wrote:
>    
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to use a 64-bit BAR for my shared memory device.  In simply
>> changing the memory type in pci_register_bar() to
>> PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 I get an unusual physical address for
>> that BAR (and my driver crashes in pci_ioremap).
>>
>> from lspci:
>>
>> 00:04.0 RAM memory: Qumranet, Inc. Device 1110
>>         Subsystem: Qumranet, Inc. Device 1100
>>         Flags: fast devsel, IRQ 10
>>         Memory at f1020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
>>         Memory at f1021000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
>>         Memory at c20000000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1024M]
>>         Capabilities:<access denied>
>> 00: f4 1a 10 11 03 00 10 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00
>> 10: 00 00 02 f1 00 10 02 f1 04 00 00 00 00 c2 00 00
>> 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f4 1a 00 11
>> 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 00 00
>>
>> with DEBUG_MEMREG, I see
>>
>> kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region
>> c20000000000 (40000000)
>> kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start c20000000000 len 0 flags 0
>> IVSHMEM: addr = 3221225472 size = 1073741824
>> kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: c200c0000000, size: 40000000,
>> uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0
>> kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region
>> c200c0000000 (40000000)
>> kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start c200c0000000 len 0 flags 0
>> IVSHMEM: addr = 0 size = 1073741824
>> kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: c20000000000, size: 40000000,
>> uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0
>> kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region
>> c20000000000 (40000000)
>> kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start c20000000000 len 0 flags 0
>> IVSHMEM: addr = 0 size = 1073741824
>> kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: ffffffff00000000, size:
>> 40000000, uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0
>> kvm_unregister_memory_area:666 Unregistering memory region
>> ffffffff00000000 (40000000)
>> kvm_destroy_phys_mem:649 slot 7 start ffffffff00000000 len 0 flags 0
>> IVSHMEM: addr = 0 size = 1073741824
>> kvm_register_phys_mem:605 memory: gpa: c20000000000, size: 40000000,
>> uaddr: 7f6dd7ffe000, slot: 7, flags: 0
>>
>> (the IVSHMEM lines are my debug statements)
>>
>> address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual  (guest)
>> address sizes   : 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual  (host)
>>
>>      
> Hi, I happened to run into this problem again when trying to use a
> 64-bit BAR.  I did a bit more digging and the test that is failing is
> called from arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c in the guest and here it is.
>
> static inline int phys_addr_valid(resource_size_t addr)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>   	return !(addr>>  boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits);
> #else
> 	return 1;
> #endif
> }
>
> the value of addr (in this case the 48-bit virtual address
> c20000000000) is shifted to the right shift by
> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits (which is 40 bits, the physical address
> size), so a non-zero value is returned which causes the test to fail
> and generates the "invalid physical address" error in the guest.
>
> Any help is appreciated as to whether this is a Qemu or guest kernel issue.
>    

The guest kernel should never have generated an address that is bigger 
than cpu_phys_bits in the first place.  What's the value for 
cpu_phys_bits in the guest? (/proc/cpuinfo, 'address sizes :' line).

Is this really the address the guest programmed, or is qemu 
misinterpreting it?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-19 16:41 [Qemu-devel] Unusual physical address when using 64-bit BAR Cam Macdonell
2010-06-11 17:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Cam Macdonell
2010-06-15 11:04   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-06-24 21:51     ` Cam Macdonell
2010-06-27  8:39       ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 20:38         ` Cam Macdonell
2010-06-29  6:50           ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29 17:48             ` Cam Macdonell
2010-06-30  3:29               ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-13 20:05                 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-07-13 20:41                   ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-13 22:48                     ` Cam Macdonell
2010-07-14  2:52                       ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-14 15:10                         ` Cam Macdonell
2010-07-20  9:52                           ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-07-21  3:31                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-21  3:49                               ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-08-24 16:52                                 ` Cam Macdonell
2010-08-25  2:21                                   ` Isaku Yamahata
2010-08-27 19:35                                     ` Cam Macdonell
2010-08-30  2:36                                       ` Isaku Yamahata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C175E30.2030605@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cam@cs.ualberta.ca \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.