From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755619Ab0F2LPI (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:15:08 -0400 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:43351 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755232Ab0F2LPG (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:15:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4C29D5B9.9040401@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:15:05 +0200 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miklos Szeredi CC: xiaosuo@gmail.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] splice fixes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2010-06-29 13:08, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > These patches fix bugs that affect real-world users of splice(2) and > sendfile(2) interfaces. > > Not sure if some or all of them are appropriate for 2.6.35 and/or > -stable? I think that 1-2 should go into 2.6.35 directly, and 3 for .36 with a stable backport as well. Agree? -- Jens Axboe