From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o6CJQNTd045739 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:26:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6357D15B232D for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id NyYFaMI2Mcvb7pt2 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C3B6D0A.2010708@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:29:14 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH xfstests] _qmount: mount w/o selinux xattrs References: <4C2CF34F.7070008@redhat.com> <20100702071006.GB30776@infradead.org> <4C2E2687.3080700@redhat.com> <20100709161232.GA26302@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20100709161232.GA26302@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs mailing list On 07/09/2010 11:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:55PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> What about just disabling selinux for all filesystems instead of just >>> XFS for the general case. >> >> Well it seems like if we -can- test with it on, that's good. >> Certain distros ship with it on by default, so exercising lots >> of scenarios with it on seems beneficial... > > It seems, but I'd rather do it consistently for all filesystems. > except we can't, because xfs actually has such low-level format checking that selinux -will- break it badly. I guess we could flag which tests can't run w/ extra xattrs, and only mount w/ the context for those? -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs