From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Faber Subject: Re: Extern dsp device Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:09:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4C67CAFB.20302@faberman.de> References: <1184DC07-4A5D-4DB0-816B-8FE8ACD074A7@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from india820.server4you.de (india820.server4you.de [85.25.152.101]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DFF10380C for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:09:59 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1184DC07-4A5D-4DB0-816B-8FE8ACD074A7@web.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 08/14/10 23:14, Christoph Kuhr wrote: > Goal: zero-latency routing and dsp This is far from being zero latency. Why don't you connect the FPGA to the ADAT ports where you can work with the audio data on a proper level. You can still control the FPGA via Ethernet. Besides, what would be the practical use of such a plug-in-device? Flo -- Machines can do the work, so people have time to think. public key DA43FEF4 x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net