From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tao Ma Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:00:33 +0800 Message-ID: <4C6DFDE1.80303@oracle.com> References: <20100818093432.646633424@bombadil.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mfasheh@suse.com, joel.becker@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:60239 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787Ab0HTEBr (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:01:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100818093432.646633424@bombadil.infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Christoph, On 08/18/2010 05:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series converts over all filesystems to the new WRITE_FLUSH_FUA > primitive that Tejun added. XFS, btrfs, gfs2, reiserfs, ext3 and ext4 > have passed extensive xfstests coverage with this, while ocfs2, nilfs2 > and fat are unsupposed by xfstests and thus untested in this patch. As for the ocfs2 part, how to make ocfs2 supposed by xfstests? Any guidance of it? I'd like to make ocfs2 work with xfstests so that any future tests can be carried out with ocfs2 included. ;) Regards, Tao > > The discard code hasn't been tested yet, I'm looking into more extensive > testing for this later. Note that the nilfs2 discard code did not wait > for the discards to finish meaning that it's almost guaranteed to be > broken after these patches, although I wouldn't be surprised if it already > was before. > > The patches are a bit larger than the one liners I promised because I > remove the EOPNOTSUPP handling that's not needed with the new code. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >