From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752828Ab0H1QCi (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:02:38 -0400 Received: from 63.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.56]:55965 "HELO 63.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752727Ab0H1QCh (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:02:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4C7932BD.8040403@example.com> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:01:01 +0200 From: Piotr Hosowicz Reply-To: piotr@hosowicz.com Organization: hosowicz.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Icedove/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Thomas Gleixner , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Nick Piggin , Paul McKenney , Yanmin Zhang , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] mm: Preemptibility -v4 References: <20100828141637.421594670@chello.nl> <4C7923B4.6030208@example.com> <1283008225.1975.3598.camel@laptop> <4C79287B.9060609@example.com> <1283009031.1975.3615.camel@laptop> In-Reply-To: <1283009031.1975.3615.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 3656359947991019919 X-Ovh-Remote: 83.24.91.204 (dnj204.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28.08.2010 17:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 17:17 +0200, Piotr Hosowicz wrote: >>> git remote add mmu_preempt git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-mmu_preempt.git >>> git remote update >>> git checkout mmu_preempt/mmu_preempt >>> >>> or >>> >>> git checkout -b mmu_preempt origin/master >>> git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-mmu_preempt.git mmu_preempt >> >> Which is better? Thanks, I'll try. > > Fully depends on how you manage your git tree, the first will keep > giving you the same tree while the second will try and merge my changes > into whatever you got from Linus' tree, which keeps moving fwd and might > thus start failing (at which point I'll have to either rebase or > backmerge Linus' changes). I'll risk the second way. I almost do not manage the tree, I just copy my local copy to tmp dir, then git pull from Linus, if there are changes I build the kernel. Regards, Piotr Hosowicz -- Z cyklu "Uroki demokracji", czyli pytania i odpowiedzi w teledurniejach: - W którym kraju znajduje się Mount Everest? - Hm, to nie Szkocja, prawda? NP: Peter Green Splinter Group - I Can't Help Myself NB: 2.6.36-rc2-next-20100827