All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: BOBA FETT <boba23@gmail.com>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] dm-crypt / Software Raid5 issues on Ubuntu Lucid	64bit
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:34:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C838E6E.9010303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C822A32.8080308@gmail.com>

  Alright guys, I think I identified my issue. Just wanted to let you 
know ....

A bad memory module :-(

Didn't recognize this until I ran Memtest86 yesterday after running out 
of ideas. Right now I am running 1x1GB DDR2-800 and am still testing to 
write to the array without lockups or other errors so far.

Thanks anyway for your help

Thorsten

On 9/4/2010 13:14, Thorsten Peter wrote:
>  Alright,
>
> here's what I did now:
>
> - upgraded Kernel from kernel ppa to 2.6.35-19-server #25~lucid1-Ubuntu
> - recreated my encrypted device using the LUKS Encryption howto
>
> On the first try, copying back my data to the encrypted array the 
> machine froze totally on me at some point of time.
> Second try, I get the same kinda lockup as before with the following 
> trace in log:
>
> [36531.299878] Pid: 375, comm: md0_raid5 Not tainted 2.6.35-19-server 
> #25~lucid1-Ubuntu RS780-SB700/Unknow
> [36531.299961] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81467cc8>]  [<ffffffff81467cc8>] 
> clone_endio+0x38/0xe0
> [36531.300041] RSP: 0018:ffff880069587c40  EFLAGS: 00010246
> [36531.300090] RAX: ffffffffa023f800 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 
> ffff88006d415490
> [36531.300153] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 
> ffffc9001247b040
> [36531.300217] RBP: ffff880069587c70 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 
> 0000000000000000
> [36531.300281] R10: ffff8800000180d8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 
> ffff88004f7a5c00
> [36531.300345] R13: ffff88000df85ed0 R14: ffff88006d2ca600 R15: 
> ffbf88001dc318c0
> [36531.300409] FS:  00007f00109f7700(0000) GS:ffff880001e40000(0000) 
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [36531.300481] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [36531.300533] CR2: 00000000008fb308 CR3: 0000000068063000 CR4: 
> 00000000000006e0
> [36531.300597] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 
> 0000000000000000
> [36531.300661] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 
> 0000000000000400
> [36531.300725] Process md0_raid5 (pid: 375, threadinfo 
> ffff880069586000, task ffff88006a3644a0)
> [36531.300799] Stack:
> [36531.300818]  ffff880050b4bab0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 
> ffff88004f7a5c00
> [36531.300891] <0> ffff88006d2ca600 ffff880050b4bab0 ffff880069587c80 
> ffffffff8117f4fd
> [36531.300970] <0> ffff880069587cb0 ffffffffa023d959 ffff880069587ca0 
> ffff880015832670
> [36531.301050] Call Trace:
> [36531.301079]  [<ffffffff8117f4fd>] bio_endio+0x1d/0x40
> [36531.301129]  [<ffffffffa023d959>] crypt_dec_pending+0x69/0x90 
> [dm_crypt]
> [36531.301192]  [<ffffffffa023db38>] crypt_endio+0x68/0x150 [dm_crypt]
> [36531.301250]  [<ffffffff8117f4fd>] bio_endio+0x1d/0x40
> [36531.301300]  [<ffffffffa0200d3d>] handle_stripe5+0x4cd/0xa00 [raid456]
> [36531.301362]  [<ffffffffa0201288>] handle_stripe+0x18/0x30 [raid456]
> [36531.301421]  [<ffffffffa02016a2>] raid5d+0x212/0x330 [raid456]
> [36531.301477]  [<ffffffff81035dc9>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
> [36531.301538]  [<ffffffff8145be6c>] md_thread+0x5c/0x130
> [36531.301586]  [<ffffffff8107dfe0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> [36531.301646]  [<ffffffff8145be10>] ? md_thread+0x0/0x130
> [36531.301694]  [<ffffffff8107da86>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
> [36531.301740]  [<ffffffff8100aee4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [36531.301795]  [<ffffffff8107d9f0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
> [36531.301841]  [<ffffffff8100aee0>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> [36531.301895] Code: 89 65 e0 4c 89 6d e8 4c 89 75 f0 4c 89 7d f8 0f 
> 1f 44 00 00 4c 8b 6f 58 49 89 fc 85 f6 89 f3 49 8b 7d 08 4d 8b 7d 00 
> 48 8b 47 08 <4d> 8b 37 48 8b 40 48 75 0e 41 f6 44 24 18 01 ba fb ff ff 
> ff 0f
> [36531.302215] RIP  [<ffffffff81467cc8>] clone_endio+0x38/0xe0
> [36531.302269]  RSP <ffff880069587c40>
> [36531.316119] ---[ end trace 2508e8b8766e359a ]---
>
> I am really running out of options here, what else could be wrong?
>
> Thorsten
>
> On 9/3/2010 20:14, Arno Wagner wrote:
>> I would recomend one read-thrugh of the FAQ. Just posted it today
>> and it is also in the web here:
>>    http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
>>
>> The most important thing to know is that if you trash the LUKS
>> header, you are screwed ;-)
>>
>> Arno
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:12:25PM +0200, Thorsten Peter wrote:
>>> Sorry man, sent one of my msgs using a false E-Mail address, please 
>>> reply to
>>> my other address if possible: boba23@gmail.com. That's the one that is
>>> registered in the list.
>>>
>>> thx
>>>
>>> Thorsten
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Thorsten Peter<
>>> thorsten.peter@googlemail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Milan,
>>>>
>>>> could you give me a pointer on how to setup the encryption using 
>>>> LUKS? I am
>>>> totally new to dm-crypt. Just used the first method that I found in 
>>>> the
>>>> howto ....
>>>> Right now I am following Ricks advice and upgrading to 2.6.35 from 
>>>> a ppa
>>>> repo.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Thorsten
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Milan Broz<mbroz@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 09/03/2010 03:21 PM, Thorsten Peter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am switching from loop-aes to dm_crypt. I am trying to use it on a
>>>>>> fresh Ubuntu 64bit server installation with my 6x750gb Software 
>>>>>> raid5
>>>>> array.
>>>>>> Array is clean and freshly created, I encrypted it using
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cryptsetup -y -c aes -h ripemd160 -s 256 create STUFF /dev/md0
>>>>> Please use LUKS instead here to get persistent header.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Format went fine, but when I try to copy back large amount of 
>>>>>> data to
>>>>>> the encrypted array (about 900gig) my copy thread always hangs 
>>>>>> itself at
>>>>>> some point during the process. I can't access the array anymore, 
>>>>>> though
>>>>>> the raid itself is fine, no drives are kicked out or anything.
>>>>>> Reboot gives me back access and the array is still ok.
>>>>>> When the problem occures I see the following trace in log:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aug 29 02:54:24 liberty24 kernel: [221558.020638] Pid: 400, comm:
>>>>>> md0_raid5 Not tainted 2.6.32-24-server #41-Ubuntu Unknow
>>>>> If it is reproducible with upstream kernel, please send me OOPs,
>>>>> if not, please use Ubuntu bugzilla - I saw strange reports which were
>>>>> never
>>>>> reproducible on upstream.
>>>>>
>>>>> (The bug seems like something we fixed long time ago.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Milan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> --------------------------------
>>>> Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Thorsten Peter
>>>>
>>>> E-Mail: Thorsten.Peter@gmail.com
>>>> Mobile: 01795322057
>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> --------------------------------
>>> Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Thorsten Peter
>>>
>>> E-Mail: Thorsten.Peter@gmail.com
>>> Mobile: 01795322057
>>> --------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dm-crypt mailing list
>>> dm-crypt@saout.de
>>> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-05 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03 13:21 [dm-crypt] dm-crypt / Software Raid5 issues on Ubuntu Lucid 64bit Thorsten Peter
2010-09-03 13:57 ` Milan Broz
2010-09-03 14:10   ` Thorsten Peter
2010-09-03 14:12     ` Thorsten Peter
2010-09-03 18:14       ` Arno Wagner
2010-09-04 11:14         ` Thorsten Peter
2010-09-05 12:34           ` BOBA FETT [this message]
2010-09-05 12:56             ` Arno Wagner
2010-09-05 16:42             ` Milan Broz
2010-09-06  3:40               ` Arno Wagner
2010-09-06  6:25               ` Heinz Diehl
2010-09-03 13:22 BOBA FETT
2010-09-03 13:36 ` Rick Moritz
2010-09-03 13:52   ` BOBA FETT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C838E6E.9010303@gmail.com \
    --to=boba23@gmail.com \
    --cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.