All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: handle ACPI0007 Device in acpi_early_set_pdc
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:06:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8AE422.4070602@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100910164556.b72d848e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On 09/10/2010 04:45 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:20:36 -0700
> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 09/10/2010 11:10 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 09, 2010 07:56:59 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When bios switch to use Device object instead of Processor statement.
>>>>
>>>> the SSDT for Pstate/Cstate/Tstate can not be loaded dynamically.
>>>>
>>>> So try to scan ACPI0007 in addition to Processor.
>>>>
>>>> this fix regression: 2.6.32 is ok.
>>>
>>> Can you include the URL of the regression bug report?  And maybe
>>> the commit that introduced the regression?
>>
>> the commit should be
>>
>> commit d8191fa4a33fdc817277da4f2b7f771ff605a41c
>> Author: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
>> Date:   Mon Feb 22 12:11:39 2010 -0700
>>
>>     ACPI: processor: driver doesn't need to evaluate _PDC
>>     
>>     Now that the early _PDC evaluation path knows how to correctly
>>     evaluate _PDC on only physically present processors, there's no
>>     need for the processor driver to evaluate it later when it loads.
>>     
>>     To cover the hotplug case, push _PDC evaluation down into the
>>     hotplug paths.
>>     
>>     Cc: x86@kernel.org
>>     Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
>>     Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
>>     Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
>>     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>>
>> that is between 2.6.34-rc1 and 2.6.34-rc2.
>>
>> So we need put this patch in stable tree for 2.6.34, .35, .36
>>
> 
> Maybe.  But first can you please address Bjorn's suggestions below?

fine, if you prefer 47 lines instead one line changes.

[PATCH -v2] acpi: handle ACPI0007 Device in acpi_early_set_pdc

When bios switch to use Device object instead of Processor statement.

the SSDT for Pstate/Cstate/Tstate can not loaded dynamically.

So try to scan ACPI0007 in addition to Processor.

-v2: add 47 lines instead of 1 line to walk namespace one time only.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/processor_core.c  |    8 ++++---
 include/acpi/acpixf.h          |    2 +
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle handle, i
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_cpuid);
 #endif
 
-static bool processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
+static bool is_processor_and_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	int cpuid, type;
 	u32 acpi_id;
@@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ static bool processor_physically_present
 		acpi_id = object.processor.proc_id;
 		break;
 	case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+		if (acpi_match_device_hid(handle, "ACPI0007") != AE_OK)
+			return false;
 		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_UID", NULL, &tmp);
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 			return false;
@@ -334,7 +336,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_set_pdc
 static acpi_status
 early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
 {
-	if (processor_physically_present(handle) == false)
+	if (is_processor_and_physically_present(handle) == false)
 		return AE_OK;
 
 	acpi_processor_set_pdc(handle);
@@ -349,7 +351,7 @@ void __init acpi_early_processor_set_pdc
 	 */
 	dmi_check_system(processor_idle_dmi_table);
 
-	acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
+	acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
 			    ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
 			    early_init_pdc, NULL, NULL, NULL);
 }
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c
@@ -524,6 +524,49 @@ ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_walk_namespace)
 
 /*******************************************************************************
  *
+ * FUNCTION:    acpi_match_device_hid
+ *
+ * PARAMETERS:  handle and HID to be compared
+ *
+ * RETURN:      bool
+ *
+ * DESCRIPTION: check if device coresponding to handle has HID
+ *
+ ******************************************************************************/
+acpi_status acpi_match_device_hid(acpi_handle obj_handle, const char *HID)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct acpi_namespace_node *node;
+	struct acpica_device_id *hid;
+	int no_match;
+
+	status = acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return status;
+
+	node = acpi_ns_validate_handle(obj_handle);
+	status = acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return status;
+
+	if (!node)
+		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+	status = acpi_ut_execute_HID(node, &hid);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return status;
+
+	no_match = ACPI_STRCMP(hid->string, HID);
+	ACPI_FREE(hid);
+
+	if (no_match)
+		return AE_NOT_FOUND;
+
+	return AE_OK;
+}
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ *
  * FUNCTION:    acpi_ns_get_device_callback
  *
  * PARAMETERS:  Callback from acpi_get_device
Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpixf.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/acpixf.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpixf.h
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ acpi_walk_namespace(acpi_object_type typ
 		    acpi_walk_callback post_order_visit,
 		    void *context, void **return_value);
 
+acpi_status acpi_match_device_hid(acpi_handle obj_handle, const char *HID);
+
 acpi_status
 acpi_get_devices(const char *HID,
 		 acpi_walk_callback user_function,

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-11  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-10  1:56 [PATCH] acpi: handle ACPI0007 Device in acpi_early_set_pdc Yinghai Lu
2010-09-10 18:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-10 19:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-10 23:45     ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-11  2:06       ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-09-13 17:28         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-17  7:21           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-17 13:56             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-09-17 18:37               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-18  6:26               ` [PATCH -v4] acpi: Handle " Yinghai Lu
2010-10-01  6:07                 ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C8AE422.4070602@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.