From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8M4EsOq043187 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:14:54 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8C9AF14F99EC for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-28-21.usfamily.net [64.131.28.21]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 5A5NVbSlBR6oBdcp for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C9982F0.6010902@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:15:44 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: System partially unusable after power loss... References: <4C928424.1020409@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Manuel Reimer Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Manuel Reimer wrote: > But why did xfs_repair restore files... For me it seems like xfs_repair > restored an *old* version of openssl, which has been replaced by the > system update process. This would mean: xfs_repair made a deleted file > visible. Is this possible? I don't know what to make of that; if you mean the openssl files got replaced by older versions, it sounds very unlikely. Sadly without repair output I can't say what repair did, but resurrecting overwritten files from the past would be unexpected to say the least... -Eric > Yours > > Manuel _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs