From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] app/procinfo: add support for show
	iter mempool
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:26:57 +0000
Message-ID: <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D2DA3DC@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>
References: <20181122141543.37067-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com>
 <20181203055000.39012-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com>
 <20181203055000.39012-9-vipin.varghese@intel.com>
 <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A3E9C5A@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Byrne, Stephen1"
 <stephen1.byrne@intel.com>, "Patel, Amol" <amol.patel@intel.com>
To: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>, "Ananyev, Konstantin"
 <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, "stephen@networkplumber.org"
 <stephen@networkplumber.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Mcnamara, John"
 <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156E11B462
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 03:27:02 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A3E9C5A@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Reshma,

snipped
>=20
> Since this patch displaying mepool and its elements both , edit heading t=
o suit
> both?
>=20
> ( or)
>=20
> What about having iter mempool support as separate patch after this patch=
?
> That looks more logical as iter-mempool is separate command option now.


This is good suggestion, but depending upon the function and debug option i=
n my humble opinion it has to go with the current patch series.

>=20
> Thanks,
> Reshma