From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54470 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBQDJ-0007hE-EZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:00:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1PBQDI-0005YV-7V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:00:09 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58991)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1PBQDH-0005YK-W5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:00:08 -0400
Message-ID: <4CC957AB.3070803@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:59:55 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] About QEMU debugging console
References: <488094999.01944@mail.hust.edu.cn>	<AANLkTimcbBwy+8a0Egge1P5=UJL3PRdjCp1hVF9x-zFR@mail.gmail.com>	<488141083.02179@mail.hust.edu.cn>	<AANLkTikhp2b73YVP=tMaKnt0s=rEvMwTypH53FawzMek@mail.gmail.com>
	<488231669.11109@mail.hust.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <488231669.11109@mail.hust.edu.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Zhiyuan Shao <zyshao@mail.hust.edu.cn>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 28.10.2010 04:20, schrieb Zhiyuan Shao:
> OK, If I get some time in the close future, I will try to improve the
> relevant part (todo list: PAE/PSE(36), IDT, GDT, x86_64, possibly
> pipe-like feature) of Qemu that I think it will be helpful for people
> debugging code on the i386 platform. 
> 
> Anyway, are such improvements interested in Qemu community? If so, I
> will submit the code patch I made based on 0.13.0 to this list. Do hope
> later version of Qemu supports these.

Yes, definitely. You can always work around it, e.g. by directly
inspecting memory, so I didn't care enough to implement it, but having
it seems certainly convenient.

Kevin