From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40629 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCzdy-0008SQ-3O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:02:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCzdu-0008MM-I1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:02:09 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:47914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCzdu-0008MF-DV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:02:06 -0400 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so7672147iwn.4 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CCF0EA8.8040106@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:02:00 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/40] xenner: kernel: 64-bit files References: <1288623713-28062-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1288623713-28062-9-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4CCEE053.9020906@codemonkey.ws> <9D1D39AB-C25C-40EB-AFE3-41122A681D4F@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel Developers On 11/01/2010 02:00 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> On 01.11.2010, at 11:44, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> >>> On 11/01/2010 10:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>>> This patch adds various header files required for the xenner kernel on 64 bit >>>> systems. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf >>>> >>>> >>> I think it might make more sense to put this on a separate git.qemu.org repository and then use a submodule in roms/. >>> >> The main reason why I wanted to have it fully in the qemu tree is so that we can guarantee the qemu<->xenner interface is 100% private. I'm not sure how much it'll be in a flux, but I don't want to go through the hassle of defining stable ABIs where we don't have to :) >> > How is this different from SeaBIOS or OpenBIOS, both use fw_cfg > interface? At least with SeaBIOS, we don't provide a stable ABI. That's why we ship a specific version in roms/. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Also, after the ABI has stabilized (in the future), will > you detach xenner from QEMU tree since this argument is no longer > valid? >