From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.62.213]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDJyZ-00049A-0K for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:44:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 11411 invoked by uid 503); 2 Nov 2010 16:22:39 -0000 Received: from b9.ovh.net (HELO mail632.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 16:22:39 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 18:43:59 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 18:43:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4CD03FCC.6030002@eukrea.com> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:43:56 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpYyBCw6luYXJk?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1288646991-15775-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <4CD02461.3020106@eukrea.com> <4CD026D8.2030101@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD026D8.2030101@mentor.com> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 4597330795632962889 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 213.186.62.213 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: eric@eukrea.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb-cross-sdk: don't reconfigure after making changes in gdb/Makefile X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:44:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 02/11/2010 15:57, Tom Rini a écrit : > Can we look at NOT doing the dance we're doing here and instead try the normal > autotools stuff? The "we need to not do ..." stuff looks to be an ancient > artifact. > following the recent changes in this file we have a regression : some libs are no more statically linked in gdb and this patch fix this regression. Can we apply it and then we can think on a better way to rewrite these recipes. After a few tries, switching to autotools doesn't work out of the box because gdb is waiting for autoconf 2.64 when we have 2.65. Eric