From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Sallaway Subject: Re: status of sas1068 ata-passthrough bug? Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:39:57 +1000 Message-ID: <4CD0D98D.3010503@sallaway.com> References: <20101102220517.41416adb.ctpm@ist.utl.pt> <20101103032049.3a731d19.ctpm@ist.utl.pt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101103032049.3a731d19.ctpm@ist.utl.pt> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 3/11/2010 1:20 PM, Cl=C3=A1udio Martins wrote: > I would guess that Ubuntu might have some 2.6.35 kernel with this f= ix > backported, but I'm just speculating. I can confirm that it does -- I was running 10.04 (which has 2.6.32 as=20 standard), and had problems with my 1068E card. I manually installed th= e=20 linux-image-2.6.35-21-server package for some other fixes to the RAID6=20 error handling, and found that the 1068E card started working fine when= =20 I put it back in. > Also, as a last resort, you could try to apply the patch and rebuild > using the sources of your favorite distro kernel. The patch is quite > simple, but be warned that the MPTSAS module also got some other > potentially interesting fixes on the 2.6.36 cycle. Interesting.... where might I find out more info about that? (trying to= =20 figure out if I should stay with .35 for now....) Cheers, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html