From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Zefan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cgroup - removing superfluous rcu_read_lock_held check Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 02:40:03 +0800 Message-ID: <4CD1AC83.4030204@gmail.com> References: <1288638909-10541-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1288638909-10541-2-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <4CD0506F.6080600@gmail.com> <20101103085804.GB1916@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101103085804.GB1916-4G3mNVrOt0i3oHxwIazZmlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Jiri Olsa Cc: dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org > attaching changed patch > > wbr, > jirka > Some small notes: - Cgroup patches are normally Cced to LKML, except those RFC ones. - I think a more commonly used title should be: [..] cgroups: remove ... - It's Andrew Morton that picks up cgroup patches, so he may overlook this revised patch. So better resend this patch with Andrew listed as receiver (and with Paul Menage, LKML ... Cced), with a title like: [PATCH v2] cgroups: remove ... > --- > No need to specify rcu_read_lock_held() condition in rcu_dereference_check. > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Normally you should retain reviewed-by and other tags that you've got previously. So here again: Reviewed-by: Li Zefan