From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC1F4C81002 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:35:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2010 21:35:54 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,215,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="678632178" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.148]) ([10.255.13.148]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2010 21:35:54 -0800 Message-ID: <4CE4BB39.1060709@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:35:53 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Garman References: <33AB447FBD802F4E932063B962385B3530383DDA@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4CE4B536.7020802@linux.intel.com> <4CE4B9DC.9050003@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4CE4B9DC.9050003@intel.com> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: BKM on add SRC_URI MD5 and SHA256 checksum X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:35:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/17/2010 09:30 PM, Scott Garman wrote: > On 11/17/2010 09:10 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >> On 11/17/2010 06:32 PM, Yu, Ke wrote: >>> Hi Distro folks: >>> >>> As Saul suggest to add SRC_URI MD5 and SHA256 checksum when we >>> upgrade the recipes, here is a simple how-to: >>> >>> Two entry is needed for checksum, take >>> meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.23.bb as example: >>> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e" >>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>> "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36" >>> >> Also, a clarification, these values should go at the END of the file, >> which I believe is the OE Style on this. > > The reason you see many OE files with the checksums at the end of the > file is that at one point a member of the OE community wrote a script to > append the values to a ton of recipes and then checked it in. > Can we borrow that script? That's what I would be doing also! If you know where it is, it would save some of the work I need to do. Sau! > I would think that keeping the SRC_URI fields relatively close to each > other makes more logical sense. But I'm not going to get religious about > it. > > Scott >