Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups

[Stephen Clark <sclark46@earthlink.net>]

On 11/17/2010 05:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 23:45 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>    
>> On Wed, 17.11.10 23:37, Peter Zijlstra (a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl) wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 23:34 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>>        
>>>> This should fix things for people with systemd and GNOME. Yes, all
>>>> others are left in the cold. Sorry for that.
>>>>          
>>> Is there an easy opt out for that, other than booting a CONFIG_CGROUP=n
>>> kernel?
>>>        
>> systemd relies on CONFIG_CGROUP=y, since it useses it for service
>> management. It creates its own name=systemd hierarchy for that with no
>> controllers attached. If you turn that off, then systemd will refuse to
>> boot.
>>      
> Do expect distro bugzilla entries when this 'awesome'-ness hits the
> street.
>
>    
>>   However, it does not rely on any of the controllers, and hence you
>> are welcome to disable all cgroup controlls and systemd won't complain.
>>
>> If you want to disable the automatic creation of groups in the 'cpu'
>> hierarchy for user sessions then you can tell pam_systemd that by passing
>> "controllers=" on the PAM config line. ("controllers=cpu" is the implied
>> default.)
>>
>> There's currently no global option to disable the same logic in systemd
>> when it creates 'cpu' cgroups for the various services it runs. However,
>> you can disable that individually with "ControlGroups=cpu:/" in the
>> .service files. I will now add a global option as well.
>>      
> A global knob is a must -- preferably with neon signs on so I can find
> it.  Luckily I don't use this GNOME junk, otherwise I'd have had to ask
> how to revert that crap as well.
>
>
>    
Amen!!



-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases."  (Thomas Jefferson)