From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] XCP: Allow XCP to use ocaml library bindings in Xen unstable (which will become Xen 4.1) -- xen-unstable.hg Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:03:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4D08A092.4020103@eu.citrix.com> References: <1291732233.13966.3198.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "xen-api@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 13/12/10 17:23, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Vincent, do you have any comments on these? Not much. Personally I think it would be better that xcext is folded in xc. It just make the moving to upstream module more transparent, and the convergence quicker. It's also probably required that libxl knows to use stuff that have been left in xcext if XCP/XCI is ever going to use it. -- Vincent