From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52154 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pch9x-0004oL-FK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:33:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth@twiddle.net>) id 1Pch9n-0004gZ-Mf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:33:20 -0500
Received: from a.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.16.245]:60998)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth@twiddle.net>) id 1Pch9n-0004fr-Ca
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:33:15 -0500
Message-ID: <4D2C8639.9000903@twiddle.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:32:57 -0800
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1294716228-9299-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
	<1294716228-9299-3-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1101111539010.1464@linmac>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101111539010.1464@linmac>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/7] tcg-ppc: Implement deposit operation.
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aurelien@aurel32.net, agraf@suse.de

On 01/11/2011 04:40 AM, malc wrote:
>> +            tcg_out32 (s, RLWIMI
>> +                       | RA(args[0])
>> +                       | RS(args[2])
>> +                       | SH(lsb_ofs)
>> +                       | MB(msb_ofs - len + 1)
>> +                       | ME(msb_ofs));
>> +        }
...
>> +    { INDEX_op_deposit_i32, { "r", "0", "r" } },
>>  
> 
> Are you sure about "0" constraint?

Yes, rlwimi inserts a value into the destination register.
There is no second source register for the instruction.


r~