From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PfTt0-0004kO-7a for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:59:26 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1175BA452B for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:58:48 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6sYf0KPHlloV for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:58:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 694D0A4522 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:58:47 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4D36A7C6.1050308@xora.org.uk> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:58:46 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1295027350.14388.6527.camel@rex> <4D353F81.50301@xora.org.uk> <4D35C5C3.60205@mentor.com> <4D35FC8B.1090404@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Subject: Re: Yocto Project and OE - Where now? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:59:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 19/01/2011 08:45, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > >> * The maintainer can have as many versions as he wants to. > my preference: not in the main layer. > I suspect all that is going to happen with this attitude is the recipes in the main layer will end up not maintained as the recipe maintainer will just maintain them in his own layer. Leading to fracturing of OE which is what we are trying to prevent. Sometimes you are just going to have to accept that the recipe maintainer knows best and knows what he is doing. Graeme