From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:19:04 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] A question in lowlevel_init.S
In-Reply-To: <4D3AAA41.3080601@eukrea.com>
References: <30734554.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<4D3A8667.7000609@free.fr>	<4D3A89BA.7070303@emk-elektronik.de>
	<4D3AAA41.3080601@eukrea.com>
Message-ID: <4D3AAF18.1080207@emk-elektronik.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Eric B?nard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22/01/2011 08:39, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
>> I am not aware of any
ADD: working
>> AT91SAM9xxx systems right now that uses low-level init, it
>> would only make sense for those that boot directly from NOR, without
>> AT91BOOTSTRAP involved.
>
> cpu9260 (at91sam9260 / 9g20 based) is using low-level init as it boots from
> NOR and is not using at91bootstrap.

Those CPUs are broken since relocation was introduced. It would be nice to see
them demonstrated working out of NOR with low level init enabled...

Best Regards,
Reinhard