From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shinya Kuribayashi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] i2c-designware: Initial split of i2c-designware.c into core and bus specific parts Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:58:23 +0900 Message-ID: <4D3E2E3F.1060506@renesas.com> References: <1295033256-30077-1-git-send-email-dirk.brandewie@gmail.com> <1295033256-30077-3-git-send-email-dirk.brandewie@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <1295033256-30077-3-git-send-email-dirk.brandewie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: dirk.brandewie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 1/15/2011 4:27 AM, dirk.brandewie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie > > This patch splits i2c-designware.c into a core library and associated > header file and two bus specific parts for platform bus and PCI bus. > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 4 + > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c | 541 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 204 +++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pci.c | 183 ++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-plat.c | 198 +++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 1130 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pci.c > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-plat.c > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile > index 0b9aa00..e1c0774 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile > @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BLACKFIN_TWI) += i2c-bfin-twi.o > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CPM) += i2c-cpm.o > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_DAVINCI) += i2c-davinci.o > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE) += i2c-designware.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI) += i2c_dw_pci.o > +i2c_dw_pci-objs := i2c-designware-pci.o i2c-designware-core.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM) += i2c_dw_plat.o > +i2c_dw_plat-objs := i2c-designware-plat.o i2c-designware-core.o > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_GPIO) += i2c-gpio.o > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_HIGHLANDER) += i2c-highlander.o > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_IBM_IIC) += i2c-ibm_iic.o It would be nice (and consistent) we could name these new modules as simply 'i2c-designware-pci.ko' and 'i2c-designware-plat.ko'. Is it possible using -objs build machinery? > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..9dca409 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c > @@ -0,0 +1,541 @@ [...] I've checked the diff between an existing i2c-designware.c and this -core.c, and found that some unnecessary changes were made along with -core.c duplication, which should be avoided as this patch is not generated using git rename dection and hence hard to review. >--- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c 2011-01-22 23:07:42.571983857 +0900 >+++ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c 2011-01-23 10:29:34.178022264 +0900 >@@ -170,57 +64,7 @@ static char *abort_sources[] = { > "lost arbitration", > }; > [...] >- >-static u32 >+u32 > i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset) > { > /* >@@ -259,7 +103,7 @@ i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, > return (ic_clk * (tSYMBOL + tf) + 5000) / 10000 - 3 + offset; > } > >-static u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset) >+u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset) > { > /* > * Conditional expression: i2c_dw_scl_[hl]cnt() can be static. >@@ -330,11 +175,13 @@ static void i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_de > DW_IC_CON_RESTART_EN | DW_IC_CON_SPEED_FAST; > writel(ic_con, dev->base + DW_IC_CON); > } >+EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_dw_init); Don't have to make it EXPORT_SYMBOL()-ed. How about declaring it with extern in -core.h ? Am I missing something? > > /* > * Waiting for bus not busy > */ >-static int i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) >+int >+i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > { > int timeout = TIMEOUT; > static. >@@ -350,7 +197,8 @@ static int i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(stru > return 0; > } > >-static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) >+void >+i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > { > struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs; > u32 ic_con; static. >@@ -382,7 +230,7 @@ static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i > * messages into the tx buffer. Even if the size of i2c_msg data is > * longer than the size of the tx buffer, it handles everything. > */ >-static void >+void > i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > { > struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs; static. >@@ -456,7 +304,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > writel(intr_mask, dev->base + DW_IC_INTR_MASK); > } > >-static void >+void > i2c_dw_read(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > { > struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs; static. >@@ -492,7 +340,7 @@ i2c_dw_read(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > } > } > >-static int i2c_dw_handle_tx_abort(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) >+int i2c_dw_handle_tx_abort(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > { > unsigned long abort_source = dev->abort_source; > int i; static. >@@ -518,7 +366,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_handle_tx_abort(struct > /* > * Prepare controller for a transaction and call i2c_dw_xfer_msg > */ >-static int >+int > i2c_dw_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num) > { > struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); >@@ -580,8 +428,9 @@ done: > > return ret; > } >+EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_dw_xfer); > >-static u32 i2c_dw_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap) >+u32 i2c_dw_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > { > return I2C_FUNC_I2C | > I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR | >@@ -590,8 +439,9 @@ static u32 i2c_dw_func(struct i2c_adapte > I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA | > I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK; > } >+EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_dw_func); Two functions above, i2c_dw_xfer() and i2c_dw_func(), shouldn't be EXPORT_SYMBOL()-ed, either. > >-static u32 i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) >+u32 i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > { > u32 stat; > static. >@@ -650,7 +500,7 @@ static u32 i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits(st > * Interrupt service routine. This gets called whenever an I2C interrupt > * occurs. > */ >-static irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id) >+irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id) > { > struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = dev_id; > u32 stat; [...] >+EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_dw_isr); No EXPORT_SYMBOL(). > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..9558ef2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h > @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ [...] > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include We could remove most of these headers, I've not sorted out yet. > +#define DW_IC_TX_ABRT_NOACK (DW_IC_TX_ABRT_7B_ADDR_NOACK | \ > + DW_IC_TX_ABRT_10ADDR1_NOACK | \ > + DW_IC_TX_ABRT_10ADDR2_NOACK | \ > + DW_IC_TX_ABRT_TXDATA_NOACK | \ > + DW_IC_TX_ABRT_GCALL_NOACK) > + > + Two blank lines. > + > +extern void i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev); > +extern int i2c_dw_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], > + int num); > +extern u32 i2c_dw_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap); > +extern irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id); Yeah, we have these in place. > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pci.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..11185b2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pci.c > @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ [...] > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include "i2c-designware-core.h" I guess we could omit more headers. > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-plat.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-plat.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..b8e5aa4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-plat.c > @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ [...] > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "i2c-designware-core.h" Same here. And the following is the diff between -pci.c and -plat.c. >--- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pci.c 2011-01-23 10:29:34.178022264 +0900 >+++ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-plat.c 2011-01-23 10:29:34.190022267 +0900 >@@ -25,11 +25,11 @@ > * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * > */ >- > #include > #include > #include > #include >+#include > #include > #include > #include >@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include >+ > #include "i2c-designware-core.h" > > static struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = { >@@ -83,6 +84,12 @@ static int __devinit dw_i2c_probe(struct > dev->irq = irq; > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev); > >+ dev->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); >+ if (IS_ERR(dev->clk)) { >+ r = -ENODEV; >+ goto err_free_mem; >+ } >+ clk_enable(dev->clk); > > dev->base = ioremap(mem->start, resource_size(mem)); > if (dev->base == NULL) { >@@ -127,6 +134,10 @@ err_free_irq: > free_irq(dev->irq, dev); > err_iounmap: > iounmap(dev->base); >+err_unuse_clocks: >+ clk_disable(dev->clk); >+ clk_put(dev->clk); >+ dev->clk = NULL; > err_free_mem: > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); > put_device(&pdev->dev); >@@ -146,6 +157,10 @@ static int __devexit dw_i2c_remove(struc > i2c_del_adapter(&dev->adapter); > put_device(&pdev->dev); > >+ clk_disable(dev->clk); >+ clk_put(dev->clk); >+ dev->clk = NULL; >+ > writel(0, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE); > free_irq(dev->irq, dev); > kfree(dev); -pci.c is primary meant for the Intel Moorsetown and Medfield SoCs as of now, and we're fine with removing clkdev API dependencies from -pci.c file. That said, two concerns. First, clkdev API support isn't related to PCI support, so it might be reasonable to disable clk_ procedures appear in the above patch simply using #ifdef HAVE_CLK, rather than completely removed. The other is, how about separating such changes into another commit, or cook it along with PATCH 3/9? I'll follow up other patches later. -- Shinya Kuribayashi Renesas Electronics