Hi Tomasz,

> Shouldn’t ReleaseAndAnswere() release the active call and bring back the
> held one in such situation?
>

You shouldn't be using ReleaseAndAnswer in this case, instead you should
use SwapCalls.  SwapCalls has the added benefit of allowing swapping of
held and active calls even if there is a call waiting (if your modem
hardware supports this.)

> 
> There also could be a little more description of behavior for a case
> when we have held and waiting calls saying that the waiting call will be answered and
> that held won’t be released.
> 

The documentation says: "Releases currently active call and answers the
currently waiting call".

Is this not enough? Can you suggest better wording?

Regards,
-Denis